Property II
Professor
Todd Brower
Spring 2003
Final Exam
General Instructions
1. You
have two (2) hours to complete this exam.
2. This
is a closed book exam.
3. There
are seven (7) pages to this exam including the Instruction page.
4. There
are two (2) parts to this exam.
a. Part
I is Multiple Choice and consists of 20 questions. This section is worth 40%. Please answer on the ParScore
provided to you.
b. Part
II contains one Essay question. This is worth 60%. Please answer in the blue book provided to you. You are limited to one blue book. Write only on the right hand side of
the page and skip every other line. If you type this examination, you are limited to eight (8) double-spaced pages in 12-point font, with at least one-inch margins on
all four sides of the paper. This
essay should take you one (1) hour to complete. If you are typing your essay, please make sure you double
space.
5. Using
a #2 pencil, darken the letter corresponding to the correct answer on the
ParScore answer sheet. If you
change your answer, please be sure that your erasures are complete. The exam will be scored by a machine
and any ambiguities will be counted as a wrong answer.
6. Write
your exam number on your exam envelope, at the top of the exam
question packet, and on the ParScore form. Also, write your exam number on the Blue Book and any other
exam materials used. Do not use
your name, student ID number, or Social Security Number on any exam
materials.
At the conclusion of the exam, return all exam materials to
the exam envelope and submit it to the proctor. Do not seal the envelope.
Essay Question
You know that Koellefornia is a race-notice
jurisdiction in which the statute of limitations on suits for breaches of real
estate contracts and their terms, and for title covenants are all limited to
one year. Please advise Bette by a
complete and concise answer to the questions.
On
January 1, 2003, Sally and Bette signed a written contract for the $150,000
sale of Blackacre, a vacant tract of land in Koellefornia. The contract specified that on April 1,
2003, Sally would transfer title to Blackacre by a general warranty deed with
title to be held in fee simple absolute. Bette did not record that contract. On April 1, 2003, Sally transferred and Bette accepted a general warranty
deed in fee simple absolute to Blackacre; that deed was unconditional on its
face and did not mention any easements, mortgages or other interests in the
property. On March 3, 2003, Bette
purchased a policy of title insurance from the Full Coverage Title Insurance
Company of Koellefornia dated on that date. That policy included the following language: “Policyholders under this
policy of insurance are limited to the rights and remedies available to them
for non-disclosure of all instruments of public record available as of the date
of the policy. No other warranties
express or implied are given by the Insurer.”
On February 16, 2003, Bette made a written
contract for the $175,000 sale of Blackacre by special warranty deed in fee
simple absolute to Carlos. That
contract was recorded March 5, 2003. The deed and title transfer from Bette to Carlos was to take place on
May 1, 2003. Unknown to Bette or
Carlos, on March 1, 2003, Sally mortgaged Blackacre to the First National Bank
of Koellefornia in exchange for a loan of $100,000. The Bank recorded its mortgage the following day.
On May 1, 2003, Carlos learned of the March 1
mortgage to the Bank and refused to accept the deed to Blackacre tendered by
Bette. On that same day, Carlos also
instructed his agent not to provide the $175,000 check for the purchase price
to Bette.
It
is now May 2, 2003. Bette has come to
your office as Koellefornia’s leading expert in real estate matters. Bette
wants to know the answers to the following questions:
1. What rights and
causes of action does Carlos have to refuse the Bette-Carlos deed?
2. If Carlos had
accepted that deed, what, if anything, would have changed in your answer to
question #1 above?
3. If the Bette-Carlos
transaction falls apart, does Bette have any rights and causes of action
against Sally and/or against the title insurance company?