EVIDENCE
FINAL EXAMINATION
PROFESSOR CALHOUN
FALL 2005
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
1. You have three (3) hours to complete this exam.
2. This exam
is closed book; no
materials are allowed.
3. There are
two parts to this exam.
Part I
·
Part I is to be answered on a separate ParScore
answer sheet.
·
Part I consists of 35 multiple-choice questions.
·
Each question is worth two points.
·
Part I is worth a total of 70 points.
·
Part II is to
be answered in blue books or typed. If
you answer Part II in a blue book, please write on every other line.
·
Part II is worth a total of 35 points.
Part I: Consists of 35 multiple choice questions. Each
question is worth 2 points.
Total
for Part I: 70 points.
Special instructions for Part One:
You are to answer all
questions according to the Federal Rules of Evidence unless the question
indicates otherwise or unless a question of evidentiary privilege is raised ‑
in which latter case, you should apply the California Evidence Code, unless the
question indicates otherwise.
Part II: Consists of one essay question, which is worth 35
points.
Total
for Part II: 35 points.
Special Instructions for Part Two:
You are to base your
answers on the Federal Rules. However, in those areas where there are
significant differences in the Federal Rules and the California Code, you
should contrast how each would apply. In the area of privilege, you should base
your answers on the California Code ‑ but again you should note any
material differences between
Deal with all issues
raised ‑ even though you believe disposition of one is controlling.
5. Write
your exam number on the exam envelope, all used bluebooks, at the top of this
page, and on the ParScore answer sheet. Do
not use your name, student ID number, or Social Security Number on any exam
materials.
6. At the
conclusion of the exam, return all test materials to the exam envelope and
submit it to the proctor. Do not seal
the envelope.
GOOD
LUCK!
PART II
– ESSAY
Defendant is charged with assault of Victim with intent
to kill. It is alleged that Defendant
beat Victim with a metal baseball bat, inflicting very serious injuries. Defendant claims that he was acting in
self-defense and was only defending himself after Victim attacked him with a
knife. Both Victim and Defendant
testified to their version of the facts.
Certain additional evidence was admitted by the court
over objection. Discuss which, if any,
of the following evidence was properly admitted. Set forth your reasons.
The prosecution offered the testimony of an emergency
room doctor that just before he began to treat Victim for his injuries, he
asked Victim what happened and Victim said, “Defendant beat me with a baseball
bat.”
The prosecution then offered the testimony of Defendant’s
wife, who testified willingly that just before the fight between Defendant and
Victim, Defendant said to her, “Tell our son I’ve taken his baseball bat and am
going to use it to teach Victim a lesson.”
Defendant offered the testimony of Neighbor (Victim’s next door neighbor) that
in the past year Victim
-
assaulted him (Neighbor) twice during arguments,
injuring him severely each time;
-
took a package that had been delivered to
Neighbor’s front porch and then denied having done so;
On cross-examination, Neighbor was asked whether he was
having an affair with Victim’s wife.
Neighbor answered, “Yes.”
END OF
EXAM