Civil Procedure II
Professor Cohen
Spring 1999 (night)
ESSAY
In 1996, in the State of Bliss, Paula Plaintiff sued Dorothy Defendant regarding an intersection
accident in which a car driven by Carla Capable but owned by Dorothy Defendant was driven negligently.
Paula Plaintiff was a passenger in a car driven by Erica Estrada but owned by Frieda Friendly. Paula suffered
significant injuries to her back, neck and arm, as well as total destruction of an expensive computer she had
with her. Paula did not sue Capable, Estrada or Friendly, but only sued Defendant, and sued Defendant only
for the harm to her back, neck and arm, amounting to what Paula felt was damages worth one hundred
thousand dollars. Paula sought a jury trial, and one eventually occurred.
In discovery, Paula sought signed statements from Defendant, who had obtained such statements,
saying she, Paula, couldn't get them herself, but needed them. The trial court denied the statements to her. At
trial, Paula showed that she had been injured, but didn't show that Defendant had been negligent.
Nevertheless, a jury verdict was rendered for Plaintiff in the amount of two thousand dollars after which
Defendant sought judgment as a matter of law, and Plaintiff sought a new trial, or, in the alternative, an
increased amount of damages. The trial court denied both motions.
Thereafter, Paula started a second case against Defendant, in the State of Bliss for harm to the
computer, which was worth $5,000.00. Defendant claimed res judicata.
Assume the application of federal procedural
law.
1a. State whether the trial court was correct as to the motion regarding a new trial, or, in the
alternative, an increased amount of damages.
lb. Explain your
answer.
2a. State whether res judicata
applies.
2b. Explain your
answer.