CIVIL PROCEDURE 
FINAL EXAMINATION 
PROFESSOR COHEN
SPRING 2002

 

 

INSTRUCTIONS

 

1. This is a closed book exam.

2. The total time you have to complete the exam is 3 hours.

3. There are 2 sections: the first section is 14 pages of multiple-choice question, and the second section is a 3-page essay question.

4. Each section will be worth 50% of your grade.

5. You have up to 90 minutes to complete the multiple-choice section.

6. The multiple-choice answers are to be marked in the correct space in pencil on the ANSWER SHEET (and NOT with a check or a circle).

7. You must begin with the Multiple Choice section of the exam. When you have completed this section, please return that section to the envelope and remove the Essay section. Once you have placed the Multiple Choice section in the exam envelope you may not go back to it

8. The essay question will be answered in your blue books.

9. Please write clearly on the essay. Write on every other page to permit instructor comments. Typists should leave wide margins. Read the facts and the issues, and, in your answer, refer only to those facts pertaining to the issues presented in this exam.

10. Succinctness, organization and clarity will count significantly towards the grade.

11. Remember to use your exam number only (no names) to identify your blue books, answer sheets and exam questions.

12. Please turn in all questions, blue books and scratch paper at the end of the exam.

13. Good Luck!

 

 

ESSAY

 

On Saturday, April 1, 2000, in the town of Burr Harbor, in the State of Euphoria, an automobile accident occurred involving a number of different participants. At that time, Burr Harbor was in the midst of a significant environmental dispute regarding water conditions. Burr Harbor was on the edge of the Atlantic Ocean in an area frequented by tourists because of its beaches and natural beauty. Tourists particularly loved it during the summer when the beaches were crowded as were Burr Harbor's hotels. Burr Harbor was also a favorite area for surfers since it had a reef about 500 yards offshore which caused breaking waves just beyond the reef.

Also loving the area were harbor seals, known locally as "Burr" harbor seals. One of the problems with all the seals was they drew lots of white sharks, great lovers themselves of the "Burr" harbor seals, and every once in a while, attacks would occur, usually just accidents, on a surfer or, more infrequently, upon a swimmer. Indeed, the town had been the model for a movie about a fictitious attack by an unnaturally large shark which resulted in the people of the town being highly sensitive about safety at beaches and for the surfers.

Some of the townspeople had suggested an electronic shark repellant system outside the reef, and had proposed a bond issue to pay for the system. Environmentalists countered that the sharks were natural, close to being endangered, and had more right to the area than did the surfers and the swimmers. Others felt the bond issue would lower land values, and opposed for that reason. Still others felt the system might electrocute boaters who happened upon it although the system had been tested and there was no absolute proof that this might happen. The commercial people, hotelkeepers, restaurant owners and shopkeepers, supported what had become known as the "wired wire" since they felt it would counter all the bad publicity, and stop shark attacks. The bond measure was to come to a vote on the first Tuesday in April, 2000, sufficiently early, if the measure passed, to fund and install it before early .tune, when the first surfers and tourist appeared.

The result of the "wired" wire bond measure excitement was that lots of different people were in Burr Harbor on April 1, 2000, when the accident occurred. Environmentalists, surfers, lobbyists, media, demonstrators, and, of course, interested people of all sorts, were in the town, and the local police were hard pressed to control the traffic. Burr Harbor, being a summer resort town, had only a skeletal police force during the off-season of October through May, so it wasn't prepared for the crowds showing up for the great "wired" wire bond measure debate. As well, since it depended on the summer police hirees, who were usually officers from big cities who took long vacations in Burr Harbor as summer police, Burr Harbor had little in the way of electronic traffic controls, not needing them during the winter when there were few people, nor during the summer when the summer police hirees controlled traffic at the main intersections.

Unfortunately, the accident happened at an uncontrolled intersection, close to City Hall, where all the available police were trying to keep demonstrating anti-bond environmentalists away from angry local pro-bond people, many of whom were teenagers, out of school on Saturday, and prone to be a little wild. The accident involved a car, driven by Paula Poundrock, a partnership partially owned by Poundrock, a local shopkeeper, and a truck, owned by one of the surfers, from Canada and driven by Humphrey Gocart, also from Canada. What happened was that both Poundrock and Gocart were distracted by the demonstration and neither stopped at the intersection, but instead collided. As a result of the accident, Plaintiff Poundrock suffered a broken leg which required hospitalization, treatment and therapy, costing $7,808.00, as well as lost earnings of $5,102.02. Also, the Poundrock car was damaged requiring $4,800.00 in repairs.

As a result of the accident, Paula Poundrock sued the city of Burr Harbor, claiming her significant injuries, as well as damage to the car. Part of the claim against the city of Burr Harbor was that it was negligent in permitting an unsafe condition to exist at the intersection. In addition, Poundrock claimed that since the intersection was unsafe, and, given that there were insufficient police during the off-season, there was a need for some sort of traffic control there, such as simple stop signs. Poundrock thus sought a judgment declaring that the intersection was unsafe, and an injunction mandating that there be some sort of traffic control such as stop signs at the intersection. Plaintiff sought, in its complaint, a jury trial on all issues, but, in a motion to the Court, the city of Burr Harbor claimed that there was no right to trial by jury. The trial court agreed with the Plaintiff, and granted trial by jury on all questions presented.

City of Burr Harbor also made a motion to dismiss the action because Plaintiff hadn't brought in her partner, Bob Bedstone, co-owner of the car. Bedstone, at the time of the suit, was in Los Angeles, trying to get a job as a stand-up comedian. The court denied the motion.

At trial, the jury found that City of Burr Harbor had been negligent, and awarded $4,801. Plaintiff objected to the award, and the court, in its judgment, gave her another $31,200, and as well an injunction ordering the stop signs installed. Defendant objected to that.

Thereafter, and within the proper time, defendant appealed.

In the meantime, during the second week of April, 2000, and before the order of the trial court in Ms. Poundrock's case another accident happened at the same intersection where a car driven by Peter Pen was hit by a car driven by Owen Outsider, a surfer. Peter sued, not Owen, but the city of Burr Harbor, claiming it was negligent as to not having any traffic controls at the intersection. By the time Peter's case came to trial, Paula's case had been concluded, and Peter sought to bar Burr Harbor from denying it was negligent. The trial court agreed and Burr Harbor sought a writ to reverse the decision of the trial court.

Both the appeal in the first case and the writ in the second case have been assigned to the First District Court of Appeal of the State of Euphoria. You are a clerk for the Court of Appeal. The Chief Judge has asked you for a memo on the following questions: