CRIMINAL PROCEDURE I
Professor Moskovitz
Final Examination – May 7, 2003
General
Instructions
1. You have 90 minutes to complete this exam.
2. This is a closed book exam. No materials may be used.
3. There are two (2) parts to this exam.
Part I: Objective Questions: This section is worth
50% of your grade. Mark the best answer under federal constitutional law on the
ParScore answer sheet provided to you. You will receive one point for each
correct answer. Be sure to read each
question carefully. Assume that the facts stated in the question are all
of the facts that apply to the question. (For example, if the facts do not say that Copp told Dan his Miranda rights, then assume that Copp
did not tell Dan his Miranda rights.)
Part II: Essay Question: This section is worth 50%
of your grade. Please answer in the blue book(s) provided to you. Make sure to double space your work (written
or typed) and use only one side of the page.
Allocate your
time as you wish.
4. Using a #2 pencil, darken the letter
corresponding to the correct answer on the ParScore answer sheet. If you change your answer, please be
sure that your erasures are complete. The exam will be graded by a machine and any ambiguities will be
counted as a wrong answer.
5. Write your exam number on your exam envelope, at the top of
the exam question packet, the ParScore answer sheet and on used blue
books. Also, write your exam number on
any other exam materials used for this exam. Do not use your name, student ID number or Social Security Number on any
exam materials.
6. At the conclusion of the exam, return all exam materials to
the exam envelope and submit it to the proctor. Do not seal the envelope.
PART II: ESSAY QUESTION
Recommended
Time for this Part: 45 to 60 minutes/Worth 50%
Dan Dork (D) has been charged with possession of cocaine. He
moved to suppress two statements he made to San Francisco Police Officer Copp
(C). At the hearing on the motion, Copp testified as follows:
I was driving along Howard Street
at 11:30 on a Saturday night when I saw a man and a woman leave a nightclub.
I’d read a newspaper article about some illegal drug use at the club, so I told
them to stop. They did, and I searched the woman’s purse. Inside the purse was
a small transparent vial containing a white powder. From my training, I
recognized the powder as cocaine. The man— who turned out to be Mr. Dork —
looked into the purse at the vial and said, “Leave her alone. It’s my dope.” I
then arrested him and told him his Miranda
rights.* He said, “Maybe I shouldn’t
say anything.” I drove him to the police station. On the way, I said, “That
club is pretty noisy.” He said, “That’s because most of us were high on
cocaine.”
Dork has moved to suppress his statements “It’s my dope.”
and “That’s because most of us were high on cocaine.” Should the motion be
granted?
* Assume the warnings were properly stated.